But, at least 60 to 65 percent go out, put on a shirt and come back in. And responses she receives from other patrons after she's refused to serve a shirtless one indicate the majority agree with her decision. Look at this: "No shirt, no shoes, no pants*, no service. Still have questions? David Perry contrasts a surprisingly casual encounter he had about masking with the violent and frightening conflicts over masking happening elsewhere … No thank you! That's where it gets complicated, because then they'd need a disclaimer, and it would get to be a pretty long sign. ", As for those who don't come back, Shaffer said, "I look at it this way. At least a shirt shields them to a certain extent.". The attractiveness of an establishment draws people in, he added. Información sobre tu dispositivo y conexión a Internet, incluida tu dirección IP, Actividad de navegación y búsqueda al utilizar sitios web y aplicaciones de Verizon Media. Outraged, the man insisted he be served. I can'tserve you. Dresses, skirts, etc. That's going to be some fine print on that sign!

Join Yahoo Answers and get 100 points today. "Some proprietors feel a shoeless or shirtless patron might be objectionable to fully-clothed patrons or that they may detract from the physical attractiveness of the food service establishment." No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service? *Disclaimer: By no pants, it is meant that if an undergarment, i.e., underwear/boxers/briefs/panties is visible by result of the gluteus maximus area not being sufficiently covered, no service is allowed. Nosotros y nuestros socios almacenaremos y/o accederemos a la información de tu dispositivo mediante el uso de cookies y tecnologías similares, a fin de mostrar anuncios y contenido personalizados, evaluar anuncios y contenido, obtener datos sobre la audiencia y desarrollar el producto. She refused, repeating her plea and, this time adding, "It's not my rule, sir.". ", Intercepting a few obscenities from the angry fellow, she managed to hand the cones to the woman. Some insurance companies may require establishments to follow such a policy, while others may not. ", In other words, being shoeless or shirtless is not a public health nuisance, Gurian said.


Insurance liability also might come into play, particularly in regard to being shoeless, said McGovern. are exempt from this pretense, save dresses, skirts, etc. Business was understandably good. Favourite answer.

Imagine standing there and reading all that before you go into a store? Because the NS3 signs still make no mention of pants, it makes me wonder if current policies are just old …

Would the restaurant still have to serve them? The Allentown Health Bureau, whose regulations pertain mainly to the protection and promotion of the public's health, has no involvement in the matter, he explained, because "the issue is not a public health concern specifically as it relates to the transmission of food borne or other communicable diseases. what if someone goes in with No Pants? You're not wearing a shirt.". On a hot day, she may have to turn away as many as six people. No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service.

She's more concerned that it would be offensive to other patrons. I can't serve you. Try it and let me know how that works out for you. The waitress was amazingly patient. Little did she know that her greatest challenge of the evening was approaching the counter. "There isn't a state law which requires a customer to wear a shirt or shoes," said Paul Ciotta, community relations coordinator for the Department of Environmental Resources. "We get the construction workers who work shirtless during summer months," said Shaffer, adding that she understands that they are hot and sweaty from their jobs. And even though she now knows it's not a public health law, she will continue to enforce the "no shirt, no shoes, no service" stipulation at her establishment. In Pennsylvania, therefore, it would have to be under the jurisdiction of health departments in individual municipalities. Although state laws do require employees of eating establishments to be properly attired, no department in state government (including DER, the Department of Health or the Department of Agriculture) has rules, regulations or statutes regarding the customer.

But whose rule is it? Those signs are only required to exist at places like restaurants, barbers/hair salons etc.. places which operate under licenses from agencies which regulate and protect public health. In Allentown, for example, there are no city statutes requiring patrons of restaurants, supermarkets or other food establishments to wear shirts or shoes to gain entrance, according to Gary Gurian, director of health for the city. So actually, though she was misinformed at the time, it was the rule of the waitress/owner of the ice cream establishment. Hoping to beat the heat with their favorite ice cream treats, patrons - including what sounded like at least a hundred excited youngsters, simultaneously shouting what they were going to have to anyone that would listen - formed a long line in front of the counter inside the small building. He told the waitress what he wanted, but she shook her head and replied, "I'm sorry sir. ", It all boils down to common sense and, perhaps, the erosion of common courtesy, said McGovern of the Pennsylvania Restaurant Association. I must give these cones to her. Whoosh! But, after making several calls to health officials the day after the incident, she learned it was not a public health ordinance in the township or state.

"If an operator wishes to to do so, it's within his purview. Get answers by asking now. "It's really no different than a restaurant's requiring a coat and tie. Essentially, it's a policy of individual establishments.". They can impose dress rules and behavioral rules. "Usually, you get a wise comment and they walk out.

that are much too short and also allow others to see your posterior...". Poll: Do you wash your hair with a bar soap? It happened on a warm, humid evening at a popular Lehigh Valley area ice cream spot.

And it's for the convenience of his staff as well as for the convenience of other customers.". Pa. coronavirus cases and deaths: Track them here. The problem is not an uncommon one for Shaffer, who's in her fourth year of operation at Countryside. "I thought it was a state law," said Nadine Shaffer, owner of Countryside in Upper Milford Township. I think it is perfectly acceptable in today's society if you wish to wear a skirt.

On the door was a sign that all of us typically see at public establishments: “No shirt, no shoes, no service.” I jokingly said to my wife, “So, I suppose it’s OK to come here without pants.” My family has learned over the years to … Carol and I walked into a restaurant the other night. Anonymous. 1 decade ago. Who is the power behind "No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service" - that catchy little phrase we see posted on the doors of so many eating establishments? As long as stores aren't violating the federal Civil Rights Act by singling out a class of people for exclusion, their property is private property.
Search Amazon.com: Purchase: Account - Platinum Upgrade - New Avatar - Other's Avatar - Archives - No-Ads - New ... Bum rushing the deli with a group of people wearing only pants to protest their No shirt, No shoes, No service policy "Wake up sheeple!" But there is no across-the-board requirement. That's where it gets complicated, because then they'd need a disclaimer, and it would get to be a pretty long sign.