Search the database to find exactly what you’re looking for! This long-running title has more than 28,000 entries that feature award-winning and emerging artists, and provides illustrated biographical profiles of approximately 75 children’s writers and illustrators per volume. JPAI is a member of the editorial board of PLoS Biology. ¶ It is the indispensable reference for writers, editors, proofreaders, indexers, copywriters, designers, and publishers, informing the editorial canon with sound, definitive advice. The data on the top-100,000–ranked scientists are provided in supplementary Table S4 (http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/btchxktzyw.1#file-bade950e-3343-43e7-896b-fb2069ba3481).

We offer two versions of the database. Misuse of citation metrics in hiring, promotion or tenure decision, or other situations involving rewards (e.g., funding or awards) takes many forms, including but not limited to the use of metrics that are not very informative for scientists and their work (e.g., journal impact factors); focus on single citation metrics (e.g., h-index); and use of calculations that are not standardized, use different frames, and do not account for field. A total of 6,880,389 scientists have published at least five papers. They craft colorful characters whose circumstances and actions resonate with readers in a way that carries through well into adulthood. Great children’s book authors have at their disposal countless techniques to channel young imaginations and appeal directly to their audience’s tender sensibilities. Publishers Weekly reported that between 1990 and 2005, there was a 39 percent increase in the number of authors. In the US, for works published in 1923 Moreover, self-citations are not excluded in these existing rankings. Here, we used Scopus data to compile a database of the 100,000 most-cited authors across all scientific fields based on their ranking of a composite indicator that considers six citation metrics (total citations; Hirsch h-index; coauthorship-adjusted Schreiber hm-index; number of citations to papers as single author; number of citations to papers as single or first author; and number of citations to papers as single, first, or last author) [2]. Funding: The Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS) has been funded by the Laura and John Arnold Foundation (funding to JPAI). The creators of some of the most whimsical, witty, thought-provoking, and powerful children’s books of all time—including Lewis Carroll, Dr. Seuss, Beatrix Potter, Maurice Sendak, and Laura Ingalls Wilder, among many others—are presented in this exciting volume. Yes Institutional affiliation and the respective country are inferred based on most recent publications according to the Scopus data as of May 2018.

As an illustrative example, supplementary Table S5 (http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/btchxktzyw.1#file-5d904ef8-fc87-4dbf-aaa7-ad33db9ac561) provides the ranking for a random sample of 100 authors sampled from those who were in the top 100,000 based on the composite index excluding self-citations. Publications of the scientists are extracted from the Scopus database using the author profiles, which are formed by a combination of curated profiles and profiles generated by an “author profiling” algorithm [5]. Sometimes, this may reflect that it is common for a small number of papers of the same author to be cited together.
Nevertheless, all their work in different institutions is all captured within their author record. For each scientist, we provide the most common scientific field and the two most common scientific subfields of his/her publications, along with the percentage for each. Among the top 100,000 authors for 1996–2017 data, the median percentage of self-citations is 12.7%, but it varies a lot across scientists (interquartile range, 8.6%–17.7%, full range 0.0%–93.8%).

Learn more about the important authors throughout history, which includes poets, playwrights, novelists, essayists, and biographers. Nevertheless, a few scientists still have their work split into multiple author records in Scopus; however, even then, one record usually carries the lion’s share of citations. Alternatively, they may point to situations of spurious “citation farms.”. All science is divided into 22 large fields (e.g., Clinical Medicine, Biology), and these are further divided into 176 subfields according to the Science-Metrix journal classification system [4] (http://science-metrix.com/?q=en/classification). For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click

Still, some scientists may work in very small sub-subfields that may have different citation densities. see the. This collection of critical and biographical articles covers hundreds of notable authors from the 17th century to the present day.

Where the date of death is unavailable, the date of birth or date of their first publication A database is an organized collection of data, generally stored and accessed electronically from a computer system.Where databases are more complex they are often developed using formal design and modeling techniques.. Because each of the top 100,000 authors can be assigned to the most common field or subfield to which his/her work belongs, a ranking can be obtained among authors assigned to the same main area based on what journals they publish in; e.g., suppose a scientist is ranked 256 in some particular metric among the 120,051 scientists in the subfield of immunology. who were born 100 years before the year entered Inappropriate merging may also be suspected when the top subfields are not contiguous, e.g., diabetes and particle physics. ISBNdb Increases to 24+ Million Books. No, Is the Subject Area "Bibliometrics" applicable to this article? Therefore, it removes the bias that may exist in comparing scientists with long accrual of citations over many years of active work versus younger ones with shorter time frame during which they may accumulate citations because it focuses on citation accrual only during a single year. SciTech Strategies, Inc., Wayne, Pennsylvania, United States of America, Affiliation Novelists became prominent in the 19th century, as the Industrial Revolution produced a growing middle class that had the literacy and leisure time to read for pleasure. This digital archive features the complete run of the magazine: more than 17,000 stories and articles ranging from mystery and suspense to autobiography and humor, revealing the attitudes, lifestyles, fads, and desires of America in the first half of the 20th century. The database can also be used to perform evaluations of groups of individuals, e.g., at the level of scientific fields, institutions, countries, or memberships in diversely defined groups that may be of interest to users. Many other problems are of a technical nature and reflect lack of standardization and accuracy on various fronts. It provides a measure of performance in that single recent year.


which may be significantly different from the formal publication date; Elsevier runs Scopus, which is the source of this data, and also runs Mendeley Data where the database is now stored. Get Started Free. Provenance: peer reviewed, not commissioned. Therefore, the scientist is in the top 0.21% (256/120,051) of authors by that metric in immunology. the dates for plays are often those for the first performance, Author and Book Info .com The Companion to Online and Offline Literature Information on about 180 000 authors and 550 000 of their books, including how to buy copies and where to find 38 000 of them online for free: Search database by author name and/or keywords in book title(s): The Community Page is a forum for organizations and societies to highlight their efforts to enhance the dissemination and value of scientific knowledge. Click here for more information on getting the most out of the database. We hope that the availability of standardized, field-annotated data will help achieve a more nuanced use of metrics, avoiding some of the egregious errors of raw bean-counting that are prevalent in misuse of citation metrics. Find information about venues that host readings and author events, including bookstores, bars, cafes, libraries, literary arts centers, and more. Each supplement covers approximately 18 additional authors and features a cumulative index. Workflow tools help users easily share, save, and download content. Instead of creating a formulaic website, spreadsheets can be downloaded, searched, and tailored for analyses by scientists in whatever fashion they prefer.

Correlations between the two independent calculations for the composite indicator (r = 0.983) and number of papers (r = 0.991) for the top 1,000,000 authors confirm the calculations are accurate and stable.

No, Is the Subject Area "Telecommunications" applicable to this article? nationality (not nationality for those who died before 1920), and their books published before 1964.

Unsure of a structural point in a story?

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000384. Several different citation databases exist, many metrics are available, users mine them in different ways, self-reported data in curriculum vitae documents are often inaccurate and not professionally calculated, handling of self-citations is erratic, and comparisons between scientific fields with different citation densities are tenuous. The database management system (DBMS) is the software that interacts with end users, applications, and the database itself to capture and analyze the data.

Overall, whole-career metrics place young scientists at a disadvantage.